In relation to discovering the very best budget-friendly flight controller (FC) and digital velocity controller (ESC) stack for FPV drones, the SpeedyBee F405 V4 and the iFlight BLITZ ATF435 are prime contenders. Each provide glorious efficiency at an ideal worth, however which one stands out as the best choice? Let’s dive into the small print and discover out.
New to FPV? Try our complete flight controller purchaser’s information: https://oscarliang.com/flight-controller/
The place to Purchase
Get the SpeedyBee F405 V4 right here:
Get the iFlight BLITZ ATF435 right here:
Variations and Similarities Between These Stacks
The iFlight BLITZ ATF435 is $9 cheaper than the SpeedyBee F405 V4, however worth alone doesn’t inform the entire story. Let’s evaluate the 2 to see which stack affords the very best worth to your cash.
For a deeper dive into the SpeedyBee F405 V4, try my full assessment: https://oscarliang.com/speedybee-f405-v4/
Flight Controller
Processor and Sensors
The iFlight BLITZ ATF435 makes use of the AT32 chip, which helps hold prices down. Be taught extra about AT32: https://oscarliang.com/at32-flight-controllers/.
The AT32F435 MCU affords efficiency near the STM32F722 at a a lot cheaper price. Whereas the AT32F435 helps 8K looptime and DShot600, and the SpeedyBee F405 helps 4K looptime and DShot300, the distinction in real-world flight efficiency is minimal.
Each stacks use the ICM42688 Gyro, so they’re comparable when it comes to noise efficiency and ease of tuning.
Each stacks function built-in barometers and assist i2c connections (SDA and SCL) for a compass, And they’re each appropriate with Betaflight and iNav firmware.
Options and Specs
Each stacks provide 6 UARTs, greater than sufficient for many FPV pilots. Usually, you’ll solely want 2 to 4 UARTs for peripherals like a radio receiver, GPS, digital VTX OSD, and SmartAudio (and ESC telemetry and digicam management however these are hardly ever used these days).
The BLITZ FC options an onboard 32MB reminiscence chip for Blackbox logging, providing round 20 minutes of flight information. In distinction, the SpeedyBee makes use of a micro SD card slot for Blackbox, which requires an micro SD card that will value one other $10.
The SpeedyBee F405 V4 has 8 motor outputs, whereas the iFlight BLITZ has solely 4. This provides the SpeedyBee extra versatility for advanced builds like hexacopters or octocopters.
The SpeedyBee additionally has a built-in Bluetooth module, permitting you to wirelessly configure Betaflight settings by way of the SpeedyBee App in your telephone—a function not out there on the BLITZ. You’ll be able to nevertheless use an OTG cable to hook up with your Android telephone.
Solder Pads and Connectors
One of many standout options of the BLITZ is the scale and spacing of the solder pads. They’re giant with loads of separations, making soldering a breeze even for novices. The silkscreen labels are clear, and the structure is intuitive, with pads organized in two rows on every edge. The SpeedyBee pads are barely smaller and nearer collectively however nonetheless comparatively straightforward to work with.
Most FC solely has one single LED pad, however the Speedybee has LED strip pads at every nook, making LED gentle connection tremendous straightforward.
On the BLITZ FC, there are some JST connectors on the underside of the board for varied peripherals like receiver, GPS and LED/Buzzer and so on. Nevertheless, the board lacks a regular connector for digital VTXs, requiring both a break up connector or direct soldering. Alternatively, the Speedybee affords a regular connector for digital VTX such because the DJI O3, however for all different gadgets you’d need to direct solder. Each stacks have onboard AT7456E chip, they usually assist analog FPV system.
BEC
Each flight controllers embody two voltage regulators (BEC): 5V and 9V. The Blitz affords 5V at as much as 2.5A and 9V at 2A. The 5V output is greater than enough to energy varied gadgets, together with an ExpressLRS receiver and some LED strips. The 9V regulator ought to deal with most VTXs, although the DJI O3 Air Unit, which might draw as much as 16W (1.8A at 9V), is near the restrict. In such circumstances, powering the VTX straight from the battery is likely to be a greater choice. The 5V and 9V BECs within the Speedybee have a better score at 3A every, making them extra dependable and able to supporting extra power-hungry gadgets.
4in1 ESC
Each manufacturers use a 55A BLHeli_S ESC of their stacks. Efficiency and options are related, with each being appropriate with Bluejay firmware and geared up with onboard present sensors.
Regardless of having an identical present score, the Speedybee 4in1 ESC features a heatsink for cooling and safety. Nevertheless, this provides about 10 grams of weight, which is probably not a major situation for typical 5″ FPV freestyle and racing drones, however may very well be a consideration if you happen to’re constructing an ultralight drone the place saving weight is essential.
One other notable distinction is the enter voltage: the Speedybee helps 3S to 6S, whereas the Blitz helps 2S to 6S. For many customers working 4S or 6S setups, each stacks will work completely high quality.
The BLITZ ESC options tabs at every nook for soldering motor wires, which might make for a tidier setup, although it is likely to be difficult to suit the ESC into some tight frames.
Which Stack Ought to You Get?
Each stacks will serve most individuals nicely if you happen to’re constructing a typical FPV drone—whether or not it’s a 5″ or 7″ quadcopter working on a 4S or 6S LiPo/Li-ion battery, that are the most typical setups right this moment for freestyle, racing, cinematic, or long-range purposes. Your selection between these stacks could in the end come right down to model choice and worth variations.
Nevertheless, sure situations could name for selecting one stack over the opposite:
Who Ought to Select the iFlight BLITZ ATF435:
- Should you’re on the lookout for the most cost effective attainable FC/ESC stack, the iFlight BLITZ ATF435 is $9 cheaper, and also you gained’t have to spend further on an SD card for Blackbox logging.
- Should you’re aiming for the lightest attainable construct, the Blitz stack is about 10g lighter than the Speedybee F405 V4.
- Should you plan to energy your quad with a 2S LiPo battery.
- Should you want a solderless setup, the JST connectors on the underside of the Blitz stack could be very useful.
Get the iFlight BLITZ ATF435 right here:
Who Ought to Select the Speedybee F405 V4:
- Should you want extra versatility and suppleness in your setup.
- The 8 motor outputs permit for hexacopter and octocopter configurations.
- If you wish to join servos for head monitoring, the additional motor outputs could be very helpful.
- Should you plan to put in LED gentle strips on every arm, the Speedybee’s LED and 5V pads at every nook make wiring simpler, and the 5V 3A BEC can assist extra LEDs.
- The built-in Bluetooth permits for wi-fi Betaflight configuration by way of your telephone.
Get the Speedybee F405 V4 right here:
How About Flywoo F722 V2 and GEPRC Taker Stacks?
Flywoo and GEPRC additionally provide funds FC/ESC stacks, and whereas they’ve their execs and cons, I personally suppose Speedybee and BLITZ have an edge over them.
As an example, the Flywoo stack is $15 costlier than the Speedybee, but it surely options the nice previous MPU6000 gyro, which can be a compelling promoting level for some. Nevertheless, the JST connectors and solder pads make it more durable to construct and restore, which places me off. In any other case, it’s an honest stack. For extra particulars, try my assessment: https://oscarliang.com/flywoo-goku-f722-v2-fc-stack/
The GEPRC Taker stack is equally priced to the Speedybee, however its small solder pad and connector location influence the consumer expertise. It additionally lacks varied options that the Speedybee F405 V4 affords. See my assessment for more information: https://oscarliang.com/geprc-taker-f405/
Conclusion
Each the SpeedyBee F405 V4 and the iFlight BLITZ ATF435 are glorious selections for funds FPV builds, every with its strengths. Your choice ought to be primarily based in your particular wants and preferences, whether or not you prioritize value, weight, or versatility. Both means, you’re getting a top quality stack that delivers nice efficiency with out breaking the financial institution.