The Canon EOS R3 and EOS R1 are from two completely different digital camera traces, however they share numerous similarities. Each are high-speed cameras with 24 megapixel sensors and built-in grips. Some photographers have even dismissed the extra superior EOS R1 as a mere “EOS R3 Mark II.” However how do their options examine?
In fact, saying that the EOS R1 ought to have been referred to as the EOS R3 Mark II could also be correct. However the two cameras do have some significant variations, as you’ll see within the comparability under.
Canon EOS R3 vs Canon EOS R1 Specs Comparability
| Digicam Characteristic | Canon EOS R3 | Canon EOS R1 |
|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2021 | July 2024 |
| Digicam Kind | Mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Sensor Kind | Stacked CMOS | Stacked CMOS |
| Picture Processor | DIGIC X | DIGIC X + Accelerator |
| Decision | 24.0 MP | 24.0 MP |
| Pixel Dimensions | 6000×4000 | 6000×4000 |
| Sensor Dimensions | 36.0 x 24.0 mm (Full Body) | 36.0 x 24.0 mm (Full Body) |
| Sensor Pixel Measurement | 6.00µ | 6.00µ |
| Low Go Filter | Sure | Sure |
| IBIS (In-Physique Picture Stabilization) | Sure | Sure |
| Base ISO | ISO 100 | ISO 100 |
| Max Native ISO | ISO 102,400 | ISO 102,400 |
| Prolonged ISOs | ISO 50-204,800 | ISO 50-409,600 |
| Excessive-Decision Sensor Shift | No | No |
| Focus Stack Bracketing | Sure | Sure |
| Pre-Shoot Burst Mode | No | Sure |
| Quickest Shutter Velocity | 1/64,000 | 1/64,000 |
| Longest Shutter Velocity | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Steady Capturing (Mechanical Shutter) | 12 FPS | 12 FPS |
| Steady Capturing (Digital Shutter) | 30 FPS | 40 FPS |
| Notes for Excessive FPS Capturing | 195 FPS is feasible, however just for 0.25 seconds of capturing. Auto publicity is locked at this FPS. | None |
| Buffer Measurement (Uncooked) | 420 frames (30 FPS) | Over 1000 frames (40 FPS) |
| Autofocus System | Hybrid PDAF | Hybrid PDAF |
| Autofocus Factors | 1053 | 1053 |
| Photographer’s-Eye-Sensing AF | Sure | Sure |
| Most Low-Mild AF Sensitivity (Standardized to f/2, ISO 100) | -6 EV | -6 EV |
| Customary Flash Sync Velocity | 1/250 | 1/320 |
| Curtain to Defend Sensor at Shutdown | Sure | Sure |
|
Video Options |
||
| Most Video Bit Depth (Inner) | 12 bits | 12 bits |
| Most Video Bit Depth (Exterior) | 12 bits | 12 bits |
| Uncooked Video | Sure | Sure |
| 6K Most Framerate | 60 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K Most Framerate | 120 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1080P Most Framerate | 240 FPS | 240 FPS |
| Extra Video Crop Issue | No | No |
| Chroma Subsampling | 4:2:2 | 4:2:2 |
| Video Recording Restrict | 360 min | No restrict |
|
Bodily and Different Options |
||
| Card Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Slot 1 Kind | CFExpress Kind B | CFExpress Kind B |
| Slot 2 Kind | SD (UHS-II) | CFExpress Kind B |
| Rear LCD Measurement (Diagonal) | 3.2 in | 3.2 in |
| Rear LCD Decision | 4.2 million dots | 2.1 million dots |
| Articulating LCD | Totally Articulating | Totally Articulating |
| Touchscreen | Sure | Sure |
| Viewfinder | EVF | EVF |
| Viewfinder Magnification | 0.76x | 0.9x |
| Viewfinder Decision | 5.76 million dots | 9.44 million dots |
| Viewfinder Protection | 100% | 100% |
| Voice Memo | Sure | Sure |
| Headphone Jack | Sure | Sure |
| Microphone Jack | Sure | Sure |
| Constructed-in Flash | No | No |
| GPS | Sure | No |
| Bluetooth | Sure | Sure |
| WiFi | Sure | Sure |
| USB Kind | Kind C 3.2 Gen 2 | Kind C 3.2 Gen 2 |
| Battery Kind | LP-E19 | LP-E19 |
| Climate Sealed | Sure | Sure |
| Weight (Physique Solely w/ Battery + Card) | 1015 g (2.24 lbs.) | 1115 g (2.46 lbs.) |
| Dimensions (LxHxD) | 150 x 143 x 107 mm (5.9 x 5.6 x 4.2″)1 | 158 x 150 x 107 mm (6.2 x 5.9 x 4.2″)2 |
|
Worth Comparability |
||
| MSRP, Physique Solely | $6000 (Examine Present Worth) | $6300 (Examine Present Worth) |
| Used Costs | Canon EOS R3 Used Costs | Canon EOS R1 Used Costs |
| 1The Canon EOS R3’s official dimensions don’t embody the depth of the protruding viewfinder. To match the everyday requirements as we speak, 20mm had been added to the EOS R3’s depth measurement on this desk. | ||
| 2The Canon EOS R1’s official dimensions don’t embody the depth of the protruding viewfinder. To match the everyday requirements as we speak, 20mm had been added to the EOS R3’s depth measurement on this desk. | ||
| Pictures Life is a part of the eBay Companion Community and B&H’s associates program. While you make a purchase order by means of the affiliate hyperlinks on this article, we might be compensated with a share of every sale. In case you discovered this comparability helpful, shopping for something by means of these hyperlinks means that you can help Pictures Life at no additional value to you. Thanks for supporting our efforts! | ||
Abstract and Suggestions
There are a couple of key areas the place the EOS R1 is an enchancment over the EOS R3. First – and possibly the most important – is that the EOS R1 incorporates a pre-release burst mode that means that you can buffer pictures as much as 0.5 seconds earlier than the shutter button is totally pressed. That is very helpful for photographing topics that transfer extra rapidly than the human response time. Even simply this function could also be sufficient to persuade some EOS R3 house owners to improve to the R1.
Second is the burst charge. Though the EOS R3 already managed a really spectacular 30 FPS burst for 420 frames (representing 14 seconds of steady capturing), the EOS R1 maintains 40 FPS for over 1000 frames. Will there be occasions that 30 FPS shouldn’t be sufficient, and it takes 40 FPS to seize the proper second? Certain – though different occasions, it can simply imply extra information to sift by means of later.
Then there’s my favourite new enchancment on the EOS R1, which is the larger viewfinder. I’m a giant fan of sharp, high-quality viewfinders that provide the very best view of your topic. I feel it helps for the whole lot from composition to autofocus (simpler to observe a fast-moving topic when you can see it higher). The R1’s new EVF has nearly twice the decision of the R3’s, and the magnification has obtained a serious increase from 0.76x to 0.90x.
Lastly, though it will likely be some time earlier than we are able to check the 2 cameras facet by facet, the brand new DIGIC Accelerator processor on the EOS R1, which dietary supplements the prevailing DIGIC X processor, ought to enhance its autofocus velocity and monitoring capabilities in troublesome conditions.
Taken collectively, these enhancements ought to enable the EOS R1 to seize well-focused pictures of topics which can be past even the EOS R3’s capabilities. Each cameras are definitely wonderful for photographing fast-moving motion, however the EOS R1 clearly has the sting. Sufficient that it deserves its personal product line, and the coveted #1 spot in Canon’s lineup? I go away that as much as you.
Lastly, there are a few benefits of the EOS R3 value mentioning. The obvious could be the value. Although the EOS R3’s MSRP is $6000 (solely $300 lower than you’d pay for the R1), ongoing gross sales have lowered its worth considerably, generally as little as $4000. That may signify sufficient to cowl a high-end lens. Second, the EOS R3 is just a little lighter and smaller – although each are large cameras, so the distinction might not matter a lot to you.
Which one do you have to get? In case your price range permits, the EOS R1 is the higher digital camera of those two. But when the distinction in worth forces you to compromise on the lens that you’d need, go together with the EOS R3 as an alternative. The value has by no means been higher, and on the finish of the day, each cameras will take the identical high quality pictures. It’s only a matter of how a lot you’d be prepared to pay for the EOS R1’s handful of benefits.