One other smashed it out of the park FOIA by Ian Hudson (https://x.com/UAVHive), this time exposing the backward considering and cash already spent on RID within the UK, that is wasteful expenditure. Let’s hope the brand new UK labour Authorities picks up on this and stops it in its tracks.
This assertion irked me, the UK has already fallen nicely behind different nations RID isn’t a magic bullet.
I’ve reached out for feedback from educated of us and can add their ideas to this.
By doing nothing, the UK will fail to satisfy the regulatory requirement to implement RID inside the UK. There shall be impacts on security, safety, and progress of the drone sector inside the UK.
RID is the best snake oil thus far, I’ve seen many concepts come and go however this one is seeming to be profitable world wide. It would do nothing for security and safety, dangerous actors gained’t fly with RID. However it would put up extra obstacles to entry for younger mannequin plane flyers and proceed the decline of aviation engineering abilities in younger of us.
I get too offended occupied with this, Ian has emailed me his ideas, as ever he has executed a marvellous job of shining a light-weight on issues executed in large companies curiosity.
That is an American concept purchased in by American distributors (Amazon, Wing) who shouldn’t have any seat at any UK regulators desk.
I’m ranting, over to Ian –
Whereas this doc is from September 2022, and a few particulars could also be outdated, it raises questions in regards to the CAA and House Workplace’s plans for the Distant Identification (RID) scheme.
- Publicly, each businesses have denied any intention to monetize RID. Nonetheless, this doc suggests in any other case from the very starting.
- The redacted directorate and division chargeable for this doc are notably attention-grabbing, as they might present clues about who was concerned in these potential monetization plans.
I discover it very attention-grabbing the directorate and division have been redacted:
They’ve used part 23, safety our bodies, I’ve gone again to argue that.
This doc appears to disregard current applied sciences like AeroScope and the nationwide drone array. This omission raises considerations in regards to the doc’s accuracy in assessing the true capabilities of the Distant Identification (RID) scheme.
- The doc presents RID as a brand new resolution, however current techniques already present among the functionalities it claims.
- Since most drones within the UK are made by DJI, which could have already got identification options, the urgency and justification for RID as introduced right here could also be overstated.
There are an estimated 350,000 drones in use within the UK. Drone operators are required to register with the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), however there isn’t a approach for an exterior social gathering (equivalent to legislation enforcement) to learn this registration remotely.
That is an absolute lie:
In observe, drones successfully fly anonymously
This line suggests the info is being shared past legislation enforcement:
RID would additionally present info and knowledge for the CAA, Police, DfT and different authorities to hold out their jobs extra successfully.
£1.8 for six months work from consultancies? That’s a pleasant slice of taxpayers money…
Seems like bullshit to me…
There aren’t any different suppliers in a position to present this service
About the one true factor within the doc is that this, which everyone knows is the true motive it’s being pushed for:
Right here is the beginning of the doc, the complete factor beneath
This Enterprise Case is for £600k to contribute to the programme of labor to implement Distant ID (RID) for drones within the UK, to satisfy the regulatory requirement by 1 January 2026.
There are an estimated 350,000 drones in use within the UK. Drone operators are required to register with the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), however there isn’t a approach for an exterior social gathering (equivalent to legislation enforcement) to learn this registration remotely. In observe, drones successfully fly anonymously. Some use is careless, thoughtless or prison, with 13,000 incidents reported to-date, together with smuggling, illicit pictures, harassment, and infringement of delicate websites.
RID will take away this anonymity, and thus present important safety advantages, permitting police to establish malicious and/or incompetent operators, resulting in reeducation, fines, or convictions. RID is due to this fact analogous to quantity plates and Automated Quantity Plate Recognition (ANPR) for street automobiles. Crucially RID permits the police to establish and handle illegal behaviour on the earliest alternative. RID would additionally present info and knowledge for the CAA, Police, DfT and different authorities to hold out their
jobs extra successfully.
CAA estimate the fee to totally implement RID is c. £10-15m over 18-24 months. The design section will value £1.8m to finish, which is able to embody technical, industrial and regulatory/legislative design.
£600k from the House Workplace shall be paired with £1.2m from DfT, making up the £1.8m required to run the design section. This section contains:
- Full design of technical parts, requirements and interfaces (e.g. RID knowledge, Drone
and Mannequin Plane Registration and Schooling Service’ (DMARES) growth). - Full design of latest regulation and laws to present CAA powers to function RID, and place obligations on producers and customers
- Draft wording of regulation and
laws - Preliminary scoping on the way to purchase
related parts, making certain
worth for cash - Engagement with suppliers – Set up a brand new work programme,
together with reporting, governance,
RAID administration and planning. - Draft and ship the Define
Enterprise Case and Full Enterprise
Case, according to HMT Inexperienced Guide
rules - Key design selections finalised
Right here is the doc in full –
Uncover extra from sUAS Information – The Enterprise of Drones
Subscribe to get the most recent posts despatched to your e-mail.